|
|
 City of Hermosa Beach --- 10-17-00
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE
CITY OF
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perrotti at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Hoffman led the pledge of allegiance.
Roll Call Present: Commissioners Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom
and Chairman Perrotti
Also Present: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director
CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to APPROVE the August 15, 2000 Planning Commissioner Minutes. AYES: HoffmanHHH, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman
Perrotti
MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Chairman Perrotti, to APPROVE Resolutions P.C. 00-50, 00-48 and 00-49. AYES: HoffmanHHH, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman
Perrotti
Director Blumenfeld stated that the applicant submitted a detailed topographic survey which demonstrated that the slope is convex. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission finalize approval of the Resolution. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman, to APPROVE Resolution P.C. 00-42. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
Director Blumenfeld stated that the applicant has prepared a plan that meets the open space requirement by removing a portion of livable and providing it as open space on decks. Further, he informed that the City Attorney has advised that the Commission direct staff to re-notice this item and have a subsequent meeting for reconsideration. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, to DENY Resolution P.C. 00-51 and to direct staff to re-notice this item for a public hearing at the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 17, 2000. AYES: HoffmanHHH, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman
Perrotti
Director Blumenfeld indicated that this item has been requested to be continued to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 17, 2000 to allow the applicant time to revise project plans. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to CONTINUE Resolution P.C. 00-47 to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 17, 2000. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
6. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Betty Ryan, representing the Women’s Club of Hermosa Beach, invited the Commission to attend the Annual Pancake Breakfast on Sunday, October 15, 2000, from 8 a.m. to 12 noon at the Clark Building.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CUP 92-34 – REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO REPAIR, AUTO BODY AND PAINT BUSINESSES AT 501 – 555 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 15, 2000 MEETING). Staff Recommended Action: To modify the master Conditional Use Permit. Director Blumenfeld gave a brief staff report and reviewed the CUP violations which included vehicles which were parked on site, vehicle repair done outdoors, auto salvage and storage. He indicated that over the last two months, the owner has improved the property and corrected many of the violations, with very little spillover parking on 6th Street occurring currently. He reviewed, however, CUP violations are still present. He indicated that staff does not believe there are grounds for revocation at this point, and a Resolution to modify the CUP has been provided. He also stated that the owner’s representation has requested that a decision be deferred for another 90 days, as the business is substantially in compliance with the master CUP. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated there is an AQMD approval and Fire Department approval as well. He also explained when there is auto storage of 25+ cars, a clarifier is required to be installed, and he stated that the northwesterly end of the property would be the area involved. In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld explained that there are several tenants all operating under one master CUP. He stated that there have been some problems with continuity between the tenant’s lease agreement and the operating CUP for the property.
Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Wood explained that the tenant who restores automobiles has been issued a notice to leave and has removed the cars. He indicated that he has been a good tenant who has been there for a long time.
In response to Chairman Perrotti, Mr. Burke explained that cars have been present all day on 6th Street, and he also said that cars have been parked for several days at one time.
Rebuttal
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman pointed out that all of the complaints presented are addressed in the existing CUP. He believed that the current CUP needs to be enforced rather than creating additional guidelines. Commissioner Pizer stated that the owner has had six months to comply and questioned the decision being deferred another 90 days. He agreed with modifying the CUP. Commissioner Tucker stated that there are still several issues that need to be addressed, and the CUP needs to be modified. He would like to see the employees use their own lot, the fence along 6th Street be maintained, the entrance gate be widened with a no right turn sign and a clarifier installed on the parking lot. Commissioner Kersenboom stated he has seen improvement on the property. He pointed out that there is enough parking for employees on the site, and 6th Street has become less cluttered. He believed that the remaining issues can be addressed without changing the CUP. Chairman Perrotti stated that changes have been made due to enforcement and pressure, and the parking lot has not been used properly. He agreed that the parking lot should be used by the employees. He also agreed with the 90-day deferral and the modification to the CUP that staff has recommended. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, to MODIFY the master Conditional Use Permit for auto repair, auto body and paint businesses at 501 – 555 Pacific Coast Highway per staff recommendation. AYES: Pizer, Tucker, Chairman Perrotti
CUP 00-6 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON-SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONNECTION WITH A 405 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1031 HERMOSA AVENUE. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and stated that a new plan is attached to the staff report showing full compliment of required parking on site. The parking has been restriped accommodating 17 parking spaces with 5 compact and 11 standard and 1 accessible space. The restaurant will now have both adequate parking for the existing facility and for the proposed expansion. He also said the proposed license is appropriate to the downtown and appropriate to the use in the zone. However, there are several nonconforming residential uses immediately to the west that could be impacted with the change of hours to 2 a.m. which is commensurate with the restaurants in the area. He summarized that staff believes that the use is appropriate to the zone and General Plan and recommends approval. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld explained the minimum size for a handicap space and also indicated that some additional planting will be picked up in the patio area which will compensate in terms of footage for the loss of the planter in the parking lot. He also explained that the seating will be provided at 1 per 15 square feet of gross floor area both inside and out, unless the seating is fixed. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Compton said the 66 seats would be the dining area.
In response to Chairman Perrotti, Mr. Carrillo said the food served would be Mexican. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Carrillo said the prices would range from $8 to $9 per entree. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Mr. Carrillo explained that the late hours on Fridays and Saturdays would be to accommodate patrons coming out from other establishments such as the Comedy and Magic Club.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kersenboom stated he does not see a problem with beer and wine at the establishment. He believed that the patio hours could close at 10 p.m. and inside hours could remain open until 2 a.m. on weekends. He stated this restaurant would make the location very nice. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld explained that any CUP that was issued with the previous liquor store establishment would not apply. Commissioner Tucker stated he would like to see the hours of operation limited for six months and continue with the hours of the previous restaurant. Commissioner Pizer stated he would like to see guidelines on how many establishments serve alcohol. He stated he does not believe alcohol is required for a successful restaurant, and is against beer and wine at this establishment. Commissioner Hoffman expressed concern with patio noise, and he would like to see the hours reduced and limitations on amplified music. He also suggested modifying the CUP to reflect reduced hours. Chairman Perrotti also expressed concern with noise in the patio and stated he would like to continue with the hours of the previous restaurant for the interior. He also suggested reviewing in six months the operation of the restaurant. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman to APPROVE a Conditional Use Permit for on-sale beer and wine in connection with a 405 square foot addition to an existing restaurant at 1031Hermosa Avenue with the following modifications:
AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Tucker, Chairman Perrotti
VAC 00-1 – STREET VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT (8) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE EXISTING SIXTY (60) FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SILVERSTRAND AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said street vacation. Director Blumenfeld gave a brief staff report and stated that the property owner is proposing a remodel that incorporates a cantilevered bay window on the front of the existing dwelling. However, the dwelling already has a nonconforming front setback (4 feet instead of the required 8 feet) and the installation of the bay window exacerbated this nonconforming condition. He said the owner requested that City Council consider a vacation as a way to help remedy the matter, as close to 80 percent of the properties along the street are nonconforming with respect to the front yards. The matter before the Commission is to determine if the vacation is in conformity with the City’s circulation element of the General Plan. He also stated that if the Planning Commission declares that the vacation of the unused portion of right-of-way is excess and not in conflict with the City’s General Plan, then the vacation process will proceed as a Public Works Department project. Also, the existing sidewalk along both sides of Silverstrand Avenue will not be affected by the vacation. He also pointed out that there would be no transfer of title occurring. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated the issue of utilities in the right-of-way will be addressed in the street vacation. He said the City would maintain an easement to maintain any utilities in the right-of-way. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld explained that had the owner correctly indicated the front yard setback on her plans and/or submitted a survey, the problem would not have occurred. The City now is requiring a survey when there is a change out of projecting windows even though the cost of the survey may exceed the cost of the window change out. He indicated that Council felt because of the number of residents that were currently noncomforming that would be brought into conformity with this change, that it would be a reasonable way to help solve the problem for approximately 80 percent of the properties along the street. He said the benefits of the additional land outweigh the issue of taxes.
Director Blumenfeld explained that there is the ability to use an additional 8 feet of property which represents an opportunity for the use of the property and a real value to the property owner. He also explained that the owner at 2445 Silverstrand cannot obtain relief any other way with no grounds to grant a Variance. He said that the curb, gutter and sidewalks stay where they are currently located; what changes is the front yard setback.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman believed that vacating the 8 feet would not impact the Circulation Plan. Commissioner Pizer also believed that the vacation is in conformance to the City Plan. Commissioner Tucker stated that the City has many nonconformances and believed this should be looked at as a case-by-case basis and grant an easement. He pointed out that the City would never use the land. Director Blumenfeld said that a preponderance of Variances should be avoided. He explained that a new building line setback could be designated for the street, but it would be highly unusual. He also pointed out that the issue of case by case tends to make Zoning Ordinances and Land Use standards very difficult to implement. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to CONCUR that that the vacation of approximately eight feet on each side of the existing sixty-foot right-of-way on Silverstrand Avenue between 24th Street and 25th Street is in conformance with the City’s adopted General Plan. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
The Commission recessed at 9:45 p.m.
CON 00-10/PDP 00-12 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #25990 FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1641 GOLDEN AVENUE. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and described the project. He stated that the project conforms to the Zoning Ordinance, provides adequate parking and meets the setback, lot coverage and open space requirements He said, however, there is not a 17-foot setback measured from the plan’s sidewalk. He indicated that staff is recommending that the applicant revise the plans to reflect the new setback requirement with respect to the nearest public improvement which would be back of sidewalk. He indicated that this is addressed in Condition 2 of the Resolution along with adding the language, "Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Public Works Department shall make this determination." In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld indicated that the Public Works Department provided a list of streets for planned sidewalk improvements. However, some of the streets have been eliminated. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld explained that the posting of the orange sign is a requirement of the applicant; however, staff may not have checked on the posting in this instance. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld informed that a 5-foot sidewalk would have to be provided for the project. He also stated that the plans would have to be revised to include the dimensions. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Mr. Peha explained that the 17 feet is to the nearest improvement which is going out to the street, as they were told a sidewalk was not required. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Peha indicated that the trash areas are typically shown in the garages. In response to Commissioner Pizer, Mr. Peha explained that the setback will push back the garage depending on the depth of the required sidewalk. He also indicated that most of the changes would be in respect to the interior.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tucker informed that a letter was received from Warren and Peggy Barr who expressed that the area remain as single family homes. Chairman Perrotti informed that a letter was received from Lowell and Gloria Stirratt who are opposed to the project. Commissioner Tucker believed that this item should be continued until the further revisions are made to determine the location of garages and the 17-foot setback for the parking. The Commission agreed. Chairman Perrotti pointed out that R-3 should be changed to R-2 in Section 4, Item 2 of the Resolution. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Pizer to CONTINUE to the next Planning Commission meeting of October 17, 2000 CON 00-10/PDP 00-12 – Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25990 for a two-unit condominium at 1641 Golden Avenue, to resolve the public right-of-way issue along with the correct parking requirements. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
CON 00-17/PDP 00-19 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #26027 FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 817 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Commissioner Hoffman excused himself from the dais. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and described the project. He said the project meets the requirements of front yard setbacks and maximum lot coverage. However, he stated that the project contains a projection of approximately 1 foot and extends 11 feet. The Code allows a projection of up to 8 feet in extension, so the Commission would have to find that this 1-foot projection constitutes an architectural projection. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated that prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Finance Director that any outstanding assessments have been paid in full and are apportioned to any newly created parcels. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Director Blumenfeld believed that the projection does not contribute to the floor area.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Director Blumenfeld explained that an architectural encroachment is allowed to project up to 1 foot, not extending more than 8 feet. He said the encroachment for the project extends 11 linear feet, creating an additional 3 feet more than what would be considered an architectural projection. Commissioner Tucker stated he would like to see the architectural projection reduced to 8 feet. He also said he would like to see the front end broken up further to reduce massiveness. He noted that the windows in front of the dining room are too busy. Commissioner Pizer stated that the design is fine and an extra 3-foot projection will not make any difference. Chairman Perrotti stated that per Code, the projections should be no wider than 8 feet. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to APPROVE CON 00-17/PDP 00-19 – Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #26027 for a two-unit condominium at 817 Monterey Boulevard, with the following modifications:
AYES: Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
Commissioner Hoffman returned to the dais.
CON 00-18/PDP 00-20 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #26045 FOR A THREE-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1520 HERMOSA AVENUE. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and described the project. He explained that there is a significant difference in elevation in the property, resulting in an extensive amount of basement condition with extensive grading required. He indicated that the applicant is proposing to re-stripe the on-street spaces so there is no net loss in the number of parking spaces. He also said that the project is 0.5% over maximum lot coverage. He further indicated that the project conforms to all the height requirements, and that stamped concrete is proposed in the driveway area. In response to Commissioner Pizer, Director Blumenfeld said there is a 25+-foot turning radius. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Director Blumenfeld indicated that the applicant is presenting a 1-per-1 re-striping to demonstrate no loss in parking. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed concern with the north side elevation needing more articulation. Commissioner Pizer indicated that any further net loss in parking spaces would be a major change which should have been defined before it came to the Commission. He also believed that the appearance of the building appears to be bulky and unattractive. Commissioner Tucker agreed with the bulkiness, especially with the back unit. He said the lot is being maximized and the storage lockers are too big. Commissioner Kersenboom stated that the lot coverage is over. He also questioned the loss in parking, and he said the back unit is much too bulky. Chairman Perrotti believed that the lot coverage issue could be worked out with staff and the parking spaces on the street can be resolved. He suggested continuing this item to the next meeting for the applicant to work with staff to modify the plans to conform to the Commission’s suggestions. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to CONTINUE CON 00-18/PDP 00-20 – Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #26045 for a three-unit condominium at 1520 Hermosa Avenue, to allow the applicant to work with staff to address the architectural appearance and lot coverage and to define the parking needs. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
HEARING(S)
14. CON 98-15/PDP 98-20 – REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25226 FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 228 ARDMORE AVENUE. Staff Recommended Action: To approve for a one-year extension. Director Blumenfeld indicated that the applicant has requested to extend the duration of the map by an additional year, by Minute Order. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to APPROVE the one-year extension for a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 25226 for a two-unit condominium at 228 Ardmore Avenue. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
14. CUP 99-3 – SIX MONTH STATUS REVIEW OF THE AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR IBIZA RESTAURANT AT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE. Staff Recommended Action: To receive and file. Director Blumenfeld indicated that the applicant has submitted a plan pursuant to the Council direction which was referred by staff and gave the owner plan corrections and found that the plan still did not pick up several changes that were required under the parking plan and the CUP modification. He said that the owner’s architect has indicated that they will be working with staff to pick up these other changes. He said that once this is done, a building permit can be issues and the outstanding conditions will be resolved. He indicated that the only item that does not show on the plan, which would be a separate submittal, is enclosure of the patio area. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated that the subject of this review is to address all Building Code issues and planning issues before a new tenant enters the site. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Tucker to RECEIVE AND FILE CUP 99-3 – Six month status review of the amended Conditional Use Permit for Ibiza Restaurant at 934 Hermosa Avenue. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
15. STAFF ITEMS
Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and stated that the applicant has requested that the Commission examine this issue with respect to reworking Condition No. 5. The owner has determined that it might better serve his needs if he could reconfigure the parking situation which would create the opposite condition from Condition No. 5. Staff is asking direction as to whether this would constitute a major or minor modification. He further informed that letters have been received from the applicant and Public Works. He said the City’s Traffic Engineer believed that this change would not negatively affect visibility at the intersection.
Commissioner Hoffman stated that the project is an improvement and believed that the change would be a minor modification. Commissioners Pizer and Kersenboom agreed that the change is a minor modification. Commissioner Tucker said that the entrance on Valley was due to 34 feet of setback to prevent trucks from blocking the street. He believed the change is a major modification and expressed concern with trucks parked on the street trying to enter may block 6th Street. In response to Chairman Perrotti, Mr. Sulser explained that the gate will have an automatic opener but will be unlocked during the daytime from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Chairman Perrotti believed that the change would be a minor modification and will not have much of an impact. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Pizer to CONCUR that the proposed parking reconfiguration at 530 6th Street, South Bay Storage, is a minor modification. AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti
Interpretation of condition relating to removal of windows on building exterior and exterior railing at 49-53 Pier Avenue. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and reviewed the history of the project. He indicated that approximately 16 feet of doors, window and wall had been removed at the southerly balcony and the west face of the restaurant expansion based upon a staff approved plan. The plan should have been referred to the Director for review and approval pursuant to condition No. 1 of the Resolution but was not. Upon inspection of the project for final approval, the change was noted and further removal of a 16-foot section of fixed window was prohibited to permit the matter to be referred to Planning Commission. He also stated that the applicant has submitted a letter with his own plans. He stated that the Planning Commission is requested to determine whether removal of an exterior fixed window and wall area represents a major or minor project modification. He pointed out that this removal does not change the function of the use in either location on the south or west side of the building and that open dining along Pier Plaza no longer requires a C.U.P. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated that the fixed windows would remain depending on the Commission’s direction. Director Blumenfeld also described the railing design currently installed without approval. Staff provided an alternate design and reviewed it with Commission. In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld explained that there needs to be a protective screen and that the railing does not become a receptacle for items. He indicated this problem could be eliminated by putting the screen on the inward side of the top of the railings. He also said the owner is proposing to have some fixed seating in order to accommodate a double loaded condition on the outdoor dining deck. Staff believes that the fixed seating and the protective screen could be designed in such a way to discourage items being placed on the railing creating a hazardous condition and use as a bar top.
Commissioner Tucker believed that nothing will fall off the rail with the current design. He said the Lexan would create a barrier from objects flying off and people yelling down at people at the promenade. He said he would like to see the Lexan extend all the way around. Commissioner Kersenboom would like the design to be integrated as part the building. Director Blumenfeld stated that the form of attachment creates an uneven effect since the face of the material follows the contour of the uneven railing. He noted it is difficult to keep the windscreen in alignment and the material tends to deflect as it gets taller. Chairman Perrotti believed that the change is a minor modification regarding the window removal. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Vincent agreed to use staff’s railing design with the Lexan windscreen. Commissioner Pizer believed that wood would make the design look to heavy and agreed with using aluminum per staff’s recommendation. The Planning Commission CONCURRED by Minute Order that the removal of the exterior windows is a minor modification. The Planning Commission CONCURRED by Minute Order to incorporate staff’s design for the handrail using Lexan, wood as a channel and cap and the height being no higher than 5 feet.
Election of the Planning Commission Chairman and Vice-Chair. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to ELECT Sam Perrotti for Chairman and Ron Pizer for Vice-Chair. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom
Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. Community Development Department Activity Report of July, 2000. City Council minutes of August 1, 8, 28 and September 5, 2000.
16. COMMISSIONER ITEMS None.
17. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Commissioner Tucker to ADJOURN the meeting at 11:55 pm. No objections, so ordered.
|
|
|
|